Read Watch

23 Stats That Separate The P2P Top Performers From The Rest

{{article.creator.firstname}} {{article.creator.lastname}}
Susie West
CEO, sharedserviceslink
2015/02/16

In February 2015 sharedserviceslink ran a webinar with Kofax and Hackett. Amy Fong, Purchase-To-Pay Program Leader and Senior Procurement Advisor, presented data separating the top performers (TPs) in P2P with the others – or what Hackett generously label as “peer group’”(PG). Below is a snapshot of the 23 P2P areas Amy touched on, highlighting the difference between the TPs and PG.


 

1/ Processing cost per invoice:

This includes labor and outsourcing costs. The TPs come in at $1.46, and the PG more than doubles this, hitting $3.85.
 

2/ Technology costs per invoice:

The TPs spend 0.35 cents on technology per invoice, and the PG is at $1.20, over three times as much.


3/ Total cost per invoice:

Once you have baked in a few extra costs, the total cost per invoice is $2.06 for a TP and $5.54 for the PG
 

4/ Cycle time for PO invoices:

This is the time from receipt of invoice to approval. TPs – 5 days,  PG – 7 days.
 

5/ Cycle time for Non PO invoices:

Again, this is the time from receipt of invoice to approval. Add on 2 days for the TPs, making cycle time 7 days. For the PG it’s 10 days.
 

6/ 3-way match on percentage of invoice volume:

TPs see 48% of their transaction volume follow a 3 way match process, versus 44% of the PG.


7/ Percentage of invoice volume that is ERS:

Evaluated Receipt Settlement, or self-billing, will not be appropriate for all your invoices or suppliers, but, for suppliers that ship the same quantity of goods to the same place on a regular basis, ERS may be the preferred invoicing solution. TPs see 11% of their invoice volume go through ERS, versus 5% for the PG.

 
8/ Non PO by percentage of invoice volume:

TPs' non PO volume is 15%, and the PG is at 31%.

 
9/ P-Card use by percentage of volume:

This is a little surprising, and will not come as good news to P-card providers: TPs' use of P-card as a percentage of volume is lower than the PG’s – coming in at 8% versus the PG’s 11%.

 
10/ 3-way match on percentage of invoice spend:

TPs see 55% of their total spend follows a 3 way match process, versus 49% of the PG.

 
11/ Percentage of invoice spend that is ERS:

TPs see 11% of their invoice volume go through ERS, versus only 3% within the PG.

 
12/ Non PO by % of invoice spend:

TPs' non PO volume is 20% and the PG’s is 26%.

 
13/ P-Card use by percentage of invoice spend:

TPs' use of P-card is at a low 3% of invoice spend versus 11% for the PG.

 
14/ Percentage of suppliers for which standard payment terms are applied

TPs see that 95% of their suppliers experience standard payment terms, while 61% of the PG  see this is the case.

 
15/ Days paid outstanding

Point 14 should perhaps be paired with this data: TPs have slightly stretched DPO, at 48 days, compared with the PG's lower number of 40 days.

 
16/ Early payment discounts taken as a percentage of available

More and more companies are negotiating discounts with their suppliers, but these are not always taken. TPs take 82% of their available early payment discounts, versus 69% taken by the PG.

 
17/ Percentage of electronic invoices and invoice-less transactions

Hackett, like sharedserviceslink, does not include emailed PDFs in their definition of electronic invoices. They do include ERS in their description of invoice-less transactions. Based on these definitions, TPs come in at 64% and the PG at 25%.

 
18/ Percentage of electronic payments as a percent of total payments

European operations have a high penetration of electronic payments, but payments continue to be check-heavy in North America. The stat for TPs is 74% and for the PG it's 62%.

 
19/ Use of a supplier portal

We see a real divide here – 70% of TPs have direct connection with suppliers through a supplier portal versus 27% of the PG.

 
20/ Use of third-party e-invoicing networks

40% of TPs are receiving invoices electronically from suppliers via a third party network (like Ariba, Tungsten or Tradeshift) versus 33% of the PG.

 
21/ Primarily paper based – no electronic strategy exists

25% of the PG do not have an electronic strategy versus 20% of TPs.

 
22/ Percentage of inquiries answered through self- service on the internet/intranet

This refers almost exclusively to supplier portals, which are having major traction in shared services. TPs address14% of supplier inquiries using this method versus 5% for the PG.

 
23/ Average percent of inquiries through self-service tools

TPs receive 58% of their supplier inquiries through self-services tools versus 20% for the PG.
 

To watch the full webinar where Amy Fong presented this data along with Dermot McCauley Vice President, Solutions Product Marketing from Kofax, click here.

To read this article you have to be registered.

Become a member to access all content and / or download it